Stuff of the Ages

 

 

 

 

 

 

For many, their knowledge of what is known in Chinese as Dōngxī dǔ zuǐ, in Japanese as Sutaffu gyagu and in Korean as mulgeon gaegeu is based on their viewing of the more modern use of the Stuff gag in the bondage arts of the Far East.  Here at the British Institute of Artistic Silence, however, our expert historians have uncovered evidence of the use of this method of silencing others in the Western world as well.

 

It is possible that early traders like Marco Polo, as well as bringing things like spices, rice and silk from their travels, also brought this method to their home countries as well, but our research has uncovered some truly stunning examples of the use of this silencing method in more recent European history.

 

Take this example, based on contemporaneous reports from Paris at the time of the Terror.  It involves one Madame DuPont, who was the housekeeper for one of the local revolutionary leaders.  The reports state that she was surprised by someone who had broken into her master’s house, searching for information on nobles that were being held in various prisons.

 

According to her statement to the authorities, the man wore a simple black frock coat, pantaloons and black buckled shoes, but he had a black cloth covering the lower half of his face, and a pistol in his hand.  Madame DuPont was wearing typical peasant clothing – a simple white blouse with elbow length sleeves, a long black skirt with a purple apron on the front, and a ribbed girdle round her waist as well as black clogs.  She was also wearing her red Revolutionary cap on her head, her brown hair neatly held under it.

 

He made her sit on a wooden chair, and pulled her hands behind her back, using rough brown rope to secure her wrists together, and then to secure her elbows to the chair back.  Kneeling in front of her, her folded her skirt back and secured her ankles, before he looked round and grabbed a white kerchief which was sitting on top of the laundry basket nearby.

 

By all accounts, Madame DuPont was expecting him to tie it round her head, over her mouth – but instead he pinched her nose closed, and when she opened her mouth to breath he stuffed the napkin into her mouth, as much as he could – but it forced her lips open, and a lot of the cloth was still outside her mouth when he had finished.  She could only struggle and mewl as he went to search the rest of the house - the cloth was stuffed in so tightly, she had no way of pushing it out again with her tongue.

 

She was found by her master when he returned later that night – and only served him for a few more weeks before he himself fell victim to the Terror, and she escaped to the countryside…

 

We do have, however, this portrait commissioned by her master prior to his – demise.  Note the expression in Madame’s eyes…

 

 

At a very similar line, on the Maine coast of the freshly independent United States, the Lady of the Belvoir mansion had two unexpected guests.  In her case, it was two French smugglers, who were expecting a delivery from their suppliers in the bay, but who had also fallen under suspicion from the local Militia.  So they waited for the Captain – one Captain Anthony Belvoir – to leave with his med before they entered the house and took his wife captive.

 

She was true beauty, as you can see from this print which was created from her memories of the event.  She was indeed dressed as the lady of the area should – a very expensive dress with a deep neck lien from Boston, grey with white spots and a white lace front and trim.  But the two men were very persuasive – securing her wrists together behind her back, and then using a white head scarf to keep her quiet as she stood there, watching one of the men as he knelt by the fireplace the second looking through the window that looked out to sea with a telescope.

 

Her eyes were wide open, shocked at the liberties they had taken with her – after all, her husband was an important man!  But the cloth was half hanging from her mouth so she could only watch – until the door of the room was suddenly opened, and her maid walked in.

 

A maid who ten minutes later was on the chaise longue, bound and gagged like her mistress while the two intruders kept watch.  Again, we are fortunate here to have a drawing of the scene – although the poor maid does not appear in this…

 

 

Moving on to our next exhibit, we have here a pastoral scene in a small English town, dating from the early Victorian era.  The lady at the centre of this exhibit has been identified as one Hannah Corbeck, who was the wife of a wealthy farmer in Dorset, and lived in the farmhouse with her mother in law, Ethel Corbeck.

 

At the time this scene was painted, there was a notorious burglar at large known as The Charmer – because he would charm his way into houses, and then secure the lady of the house before taking her valuables.  From the police reports, we have been able to determine the likely course of events that led to the scene you see here.  It was early afternoon, and Hannah Corbeck had been visiting friends before returning to the farmhouse.  As she entered, a horse drawn carriage drew up, and the young man asked for direction to a nearby farm.

 

She offered him those directions, but as she turned he pressed the end of a pistol against her back, and made her walk in.  Hannah was conservatively dressed – a grey and blue silk robe with a brown sash round her waist, black boots, and a bonnet.  The man forced her into her house, and at least allowed her to remove her bonnet before he secured her wrists together behind her back with twine, and made her sit on a chair.

 

She would have protested – but he produced a white handkerchief and pushed it into her mouth, with many admonishments not to try and push it out as he knelt down and secured her ankles over the leather of her boots.

 

He started to search the room she was in, as she twisted round – but the cords were too tight, too thin, and although the cloth in her mouth was soaking up all the saliva, she was too petrified to try and call for help – so when she heard her mother in law return, she had no way to warn her.  All she could do was listen as the man slipped out, and she heard the muffled but surprised yelp, some talking – and then silence.

 

The man came back into the room, checked Hannah was all right, and then went to search the rest of the house. She could hear the muffled calls, but it was only when she heard the man leave that she got the courage to stand up and hop to the door.

 

Ethel was sat in the hallway, wearing her cream blouse and her dress with the red skirt and the waistcoat of gold silk  - but like her, she too had her wrists secured behind her back, her ankles tied together – and half a handkerchief sticking out of her mouth.

 

They exchanged a few grunts, before she jumped over and sat with her, trying to free each other – without success, according to the reports of the police detective, until her husband returned…

 

As you examine the painting, note the effective use of shadowing, and also the expression on Hannah’s face as she hears the muffled conversation.  Truly exquisite and evocative…

 

The art of the political cartoonist is a sorely neglected area for those who do not regard the use of caricature as true art.  This is not a view we share here at this institute – indeed, we have a fine collection of US Forces magazines that make sue of that format – but this one in particular may catch your eye. 

 

IT dates from the 1930s, and shows Joseph Goebbels – shall we say, explaining his approach to information dissemination to an unfortunate woman.  While one is tempted to see parallels with certain other political representatives today, what I want to tell you is the truth that inspired the way the woman is displayed here.

 

The real woman was Frau Sigrid von Neumann, the wife of the bürgermeister of a small town in Bavaria.  The way she was dressed, according to police reports, is very similar to what you see here – a long dress with a white apron over the skirt, her blonde hair in a plait down her back, and black laced boots.

 

What she was not aware of as she walked round the market that day was that she was being watched by two men who had - shall we say, an issue with some decisions her husband had made, and lost their jobs as a result.  They followed her home, and when she placed her basket on the kitchen table, they burst in and grabbed her.

 

One of the men pulled her hands behind her back, holding her wrists together while the second picked up a ball of butcher’s twine and used it to secure her wrists together.  She was then made to sit on a chair by the wooden table, struggling as the man continued to hold her, and the second man took the twine under the seat and used it to lash her ankles together before he cut it free with a knife.

 

He then stood up and pulled a dish towel from the table, folding it and using it to blindfold her – and yes, they did move her hair plait to trap in under the cloth band, while his partner told her not to scream, they were not going to hurt her.  I think you can imagine her response to that – the good lady started to scream for help, which is why the second towel ended up in her mouth and hanging out from between her lips.

 

One of them stayed with her while the other ransacked the house – but they were both caught when her husband returned unexpectedly, and with he local chief of police as well. Very bad luck…

 

On the other hand, her situation did prove an influence to raising much greater evils…

 

 

 

Let us move to a more recent time – although I suppose to you, sixty years still seems several lifetimes ago.  What we have here is a modern American classic, is perhaps a little more to our tastes than many.

 

This was painted by a sixteen year-old girl called Mandy, and depicts her mother Ashley, in a rather silent pose as you can see.  According to Mandy, it actually started as a dare when her mother wished to impart some secrets of being a good housewife to her daughter.

 

So Mandy decided it would be a good idea to teach her mother something in return – something she had learned from reading some very specialised magazines.  Now, her mother was very conservatively dressed – a brown short sleeved dress with a white collar, a white lace underskirt, hose and brown kitten heels. 

 

Of course, her mother wished to continue being the educator.  But Mandy was very good at chemistry, and as such she employed a bottle of chloroform to knock her mother out for a little while…

 

When Ashley woke up, she found Mandy had taken her shoes off, crossed her ankles and tied them together with a brown silk headscarf.  Obviously, she tried to move her hands round from behind her and undo the scarf – only to find a second scarf was holding her wrists together.

 

And there was a third brown scarf related issue – one which became clear as she looked down and saw the rolled up end sticking out from between her lips.  She did try to get free after that – and then she saw Mandy doing the preliminary sketches.

 

What followed, according to Mandy, was great fun.  Ashley, on the other hand, had some choice words to say according to her daughter.

 

Such a pity they were all muffled – but a remarkably good portrait for one so young…

 

 

Let me offer one more exhibit to you – from the now classic “True Crime” fad of the sixties and seventies.  This one is an interesting one – have you heard of rotoscoping?  It’s a technique used in films where an animator draws over live actions.  There’s also the work of artists producing prints based on photos.

 

This particular one illustrates a break-in at a Manhattan apartment, which the resident disturbed when she returned from a cocktail party.  She was wearing a red cocktail cress, red heels and a red scarf holding back her black hair, pearls round her neck.

 

Strangely enough, when her housekeeper found her the next morning, she still had her pearls on. This exhibit was derived from the photographs taken by the CSI attending – at some cost, it has to be said.

 

She was lying on herbed, unconscious,. White rope used to hold her crossed wrists together behind her back and her ankles so that they could not be moved apart.  She still had her pearls, and her earrings, so robbery may not have been the motive, but someone had stopped her from raising the alarm – in her case, with a red teddy nightie which had been stuffed into her mouth, the edges sticking out from her lips.

 

As it turned out, she was targeted to allow someone to carry out a shooting of someone in a nearby building – and she woke up soon after the photos were taken.  But we are grateful that someone managed to create this memory of her predicament.

 

So, we hope you enjoyed this brief viewing – questions?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return to the DiD Channel index

 

Return to the main index